Search our glossary for commonly used sustainability and ESG concepts, terms and definitions.
Source: SAI
Scope 1 or direct use GHG emissions are caused by sources owned or controlled by the enterprise that occur within the enterprise’s organizational boundary (i.e. stationary combustion, mobile combustion, process emissions and/or fugitive emissions).
Scope 2 or indirect GHG emissions arise from the generation of purchased electricity, heating, cooling and steam. Scope 2 emissions are indirect because they occur at sources owned or controlled by another organization (e.g. electricity provider) but occur as a consequence of enterprise activities.
Scope 3 emissions or other GHG indirect emissions occur along the entire value chain as a consequence of enterprise activities. Scope 3 emissions include those that occur as a result of employee commutes to work, business travel, the extraction and production of purchased materials used by the enterprise, transportation of purchased fuel, the use of enterprise sold products and services (including through treatment of final product waste) and data management practices.
Michael E. Porter and Michael R. Kramer published a seminal article in the Harvard Business Review in 2011 entitled “Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth.” They believe many enterprises are trapped in a short-term value-creation cycle, driven by shareholder demands of quarterly (or other similarly short term period) financial growth. This pressure prevents enterprises from taking a broader or longer-term view of what might better serve their customers and everyone else impacted by their operations. It locks them into unsustainable practices such as the depletion of natural resources and contributes to other stress points, such as employee, customer, supplier and community well-being. Whilst shareholders may be satisfied, ignoring the bigger picture is in fact a false economy as it threatens the longer-term viability of an enterprise by negatively impacting stakeholders who can in turn hurt the enterprise. Unhappy stakeholders can drive a reduction in sales, increase the threat of litigation and fines and damage an enterprise’s reputation through negative publicity which in turn weakens or withdraws an enterprise’s social license to operate.
Porter and Kramer tell us the principle of shared value “involves creating economic value in a way that also creates value for society by addressing its needs and challenges. Business must reconnect enterprise success with social progress. Shared value is not social responsibility, philanthropy, or even sustainability, but a new way to achieve economic success”.
Source: Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 2-17.
land (peatlands, forests, rocks, soil etc.), the ocean and fossils
Source: OECD
See Also: Impact Revolution, Sir Ronald Cohen
Legitimacy is defined as “ a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.”
Source: Legitimacy definition Suchman 1995
Stakeholders can include owners, employees, customers, suppliers, governments, industry regulating or standards bodies, banks, investors, lenders, insurers, unions, local communities, NGOs, environmental & social justice groups and the media.
Source: Freeman 1984
See Also: Freeman, Harrison, Wicks 2007; Freeman, Harrison, Zyglidopoulos 2018
Stakeholder capitalism represents the ideological shift from the traditional Friedman-esque ‘management of stakeholders’ or ‘management for shareholders’ approach to a ‘management for all stakeholders’ approach. This shift includes a transition from short-term to long-term thinking and requires enterprises to earn their social licence to operate.
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and a proponent for ethical business conduct since the 1970s has used his global platform of the Annual Davos Summit to promote a new global economic model of Stakeholder Capitalism which “works for Progress, People and Planet”. Schwab describes stakeholder capitalism as a system where, “the interests of all stakeholders in the economy and society are taken on board, enterprises optimize for more than just short-term profits, and governments are the guardians of equality of opportunity, a level-playing field in competition, and a fair contribution of and distribution to all stakeholders with regards to the sustainability and inclusivity of the system.”
Source: Schwab and Vanham, 2021a; Schwab and Vanham, 2021b; Davos Manifesto 1973: A Code of Ethics for Business Leaders; Schwab, 1971
Stakeholder groups can include owners, employees, customers, suppliers, governments, industry regulating or standards bodies, banks, investors, lenders, insurers, unions, local communities, NGOs, environmental & social justice groups and the media.
Source: Freeman 1984
See Also: Freeman, Harrison, Wicks 2007; Freeman, Harrison, Zyglidopoulos 2018
Source: World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987
See Also: UN GA 2015, UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Take Action for the SDGs
Source: UN SDGs, Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
